Skip to main content

  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our Process
    • Our Team
    • Client Relationship Summary
  • Our Services
    • Overview
    • Wealth Management
    • Investment Philosophy
  • Our Team
  • Blog
  • Client Center
  • Contact

    You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blogs
  3. Process vs. Outcome

Process vs. Outcome

Submitted by Legacy Financial Group on March 21st, 2016

Recently a well know financial advisor wrote a very good article concerning the difference between investing process and investing outcome.  It is easy to read and he provides some great examples so I encourage you to read it:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/get-there/youre-obsessed-with-outcomes-heres-why-attention-to-process-pays-off/2016/01/22/f03828a4-bebe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

I think his final paragraph summarizes the concept very well:

“We never really know what the source of a good outcome is; however, we have a high degree of confidence what the probabilities are for a good process. A strong process is a guarantee — not of outcome or results, but of the highest probability of obtaining desired results. That’s why it is so important to investors.”

If you are a client of ours or have been reading our emails for any length of time you know we constantly preach to focus only on what you can control.  You can control the process that creates your financial plan and investment strategy.  Things you can control do NOT include:

  • Stock market performance
  • Which market will do best
  • The Economy
  • The next President

These statements often seem counterintuitive to what the typical person gets sold by the investing community.  Traditional investment advice is the exact opposite.  Investors are told to find the person who is best at picking the next Apple or who knows the direction of China’s economy.  The implication is that only with the knowledge of these things can you be successful at investing.  However; the truth is that developing an investment strategy based on predicting outcomes rather than processes nearly always leads to poor results and sometimes destroys retirements.

A specific example helps illustrate the importance of process over outcome.  The past few years have seen the US large cap stock market perform fairly well while many other markets, even within the US, have struggled.  Below is the well know “quilt chart” showing different country performances over the past 20 years.

It is easy to see that the US was the top performer in 2013 and 2014 and eked out a positive gain in 2015 even though 2015 was a negative year for many markets around the world.  Looking at this performance the emotional part of our brains fires out thoughts like:

“Why are we underperforming?”

“Should we be investing outside the US?”

“My portfolio is too risky”

While these initial reactions are normal, they are actually produced by some strong behavioral biases and focus on outcome rather than process.  I will leave the behavioral biases for another time. (although I have written about them before.  Here and here).  My focus now is on process vs outcome.

The statements above all suggest it would be better to have a concentrated portfolio that only holds the top performing investment each year and that risk is defined as underperforming the S&P 500.  When we contemplate that statement for a few moments the non-emotional part of our brain can easily see that thinking is incorrect.  There is no sound process that would lead to someone only owning the S&P 500 the past 3 years.  In fact, the only processes that could have led to such a portfolio would be extremely hazardous to your financial future.  Below are examples of such bad processes:

Poor Processes:

Creating over concentrated portfolios, changing your portfolio based on market predictions, and defining risk as underperforming a single index.

Sound Processes

Creating diversified portfolios, changing your portfolio based on personal goals or life changes, and defining risk as not meeting your long term goals.

As wise investors we must create sound processes built only on what we can control.  Giving up sound processes in an attempt to chase short term outcomes is a guaranteed recipe for disaster.

 

Categories

  • 2012 market return (1)
  • 2013 inflation adjustments (1)
  • 2014 market performance (1)
  • 4% rule (1)
  • Active Management (4)
  • Anchoring (1)
  • Asset Allocation (3)
  • Behavioral Finance (2)
  • best performing country (1)
  • Business Insider (1)
  • Buy and Hold (1)
  • California Public Employees' Retirement System (1)
  • CalPERS (1)
  • cognitive bias (2)
  • commission (1)
  • correction (1)
  • Dan Wheeler (1)
  • denmark (1)
  • Discipline (1)
  • Diversification (5)
  • dividend stocks (1)
  • Dow Jones 14000 (1)
  • economy (1)
  • election 2012 (1)
  • employee stock options (1)
  • equities (1)
  • failed predictions (1)
  • Fast and Slow (1)
  • fee only advisor (2)
  • fiduciary Standard (1)
  • financial advising (2)
  • financial sales (1)
  • Forecasting (3)
  • Interest rates (2)
  • Investor bias (2)
  • IRS (1)
  • is 2013 like 1994 (1)
  • Jim Cramer (1)
  • jobs report (1)
  • long term performance (1)
  • low basis stock (1)
  • Mark Cuban (1)
  • Market Peak (1)
  • Market Predictions (3)
  • Market PullBack (3)
  • market returns during eleciton years (1)
  • Market Timing (5)
  • nonqualified stock options (1)
  • Oklahoma (1)
  • political party (1)
  • predicably (1)
  • president (1)
  • presidential election (1)
  • Quantitative Easing (1)
  • retirement contributions (1)
  • retirement income (1)
  • rising interest rates (2)
  • S&P 500 (1)
  • safe withdrawal rate (1)
  • seasonal adjustments (1)
  • short term performance (1)
  • should I put investments in cash (1)
  • SP 500 1500 (1)
  • stock donation (1)
  • stock market 1994 (1)
  • stock market returns (1)
  • stock picking (1)
  • Successful Investing (1)
  • survivorship bias (1)
  • Tapering (1)
  • tax changes (1)
  • Tax Planning (1)
  • tax strategy (2)
  • The Fed (1)
  • The Princess Bride (1)
  • Thinking (1)
  • Tulsa (1)
  • unpredictable (1)
  • wall street (1)
  • Warren Buffett (1)
  • Year End (1)
  • year end giving (1)

Archived Blog

  • December 2020 (1)
  • May 2020 (1)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • October 2018 (1)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (1)
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››

918-665-0826
 

 

2508 E. 21st St, Tulsa, OK 74114


 

elissa@legacyadvisor.net

 

Disclaimer

Photo Tulsa - Randy Torres

© 2021 The Legacy Financial Group. All rights reserved.

Website Design For Financial Services Professionals