I have a client who is a big OU Sooner fan. I mentioned to him my hope that OU would stand a chance against the heavily favored Alabama Crimson Tide to which he responded in jest, "I hope you aren't putting MY money on an upset." After the game I could not help but see the parallel to this year's outcome and how people actually think about investing for retirement.
"I went to cash because..." Fill in the blank. This is a common phrase uttered by market pundits, advisors, and amateur investors everywhere. And there always is a seemingly very smart reason to justify putting your investments in cash instead of the market. However; what appears on the surface to be a good investing idea often stands in sharp contrast to the actual results.
If you are a human and an investor there is good news and bad news. The bad news first. Your brain sucks. It operates in almost every way possible to encourage you to make bad investing decisions. It is also why you care a lot more about the Fed’s actions than you really should.
A test will easily demonstrate your faulty brain at work.
There has been much discussion lately on the reliability of the suggested 4% withdrawal rate. It has long been held that withdrawing 4% from your retirement assets per year was a “safe” withdrawal rate. “Safe” means if the retiree starts taking 4% out of their portfolio when they retire and increase that amount by inflation each year then that income will last them the rest of their life. 4% became a rule-of-thumb even though it actually has strong academic backing. Recently, however, online articles and general advisor talk have suggested that given the current low rate environment or due to big market collapses like 2008 and 2009 a 4% withdrawal rate is no longer feasible.
The stock market recently surpassed two very meaningful price points. The Dow Jones surpassed 14,000 and the S&P 500 reached 1,500 for the first time since 2007. Many people are now starting to wonder whether we are “due for a correction” or are we at a market peak. As I write this article the market indeed has pulled back from these highs. But what, if any, influence should these index levels have to do with investing long term?
I think there are at least a few important questions to consider when this type of thinking creeps into our heads.
By Eric Burkholder, Portfolio Manager
A 2012 review of market outcomes and the “experts” who failed to predict them.
“Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future.” - Niels Bohr, Danish physicist
The world of investment advice and market forecasting is very profitable. Let me rephrase that. The world of investment advice and market forecasting is very profitable for those selling the advice. The outcome for those who invest on said advice is not quite as rosy. So each year I make a point to track all the “expert” predictions and highlight some of the more pronounced failures. 2012, as expected, did not disappoint.
With only a short time left until we select the 45th President of the United States of America many investors are in a state of panic. Many believe the market is waiting for the outcome and if the "correct" candidate is selected the stock market will immediately surge on the news. Or, if the "wrong" candidate is selected the market will tank the next day. Fortunately, history provides a guide on this matter and it suggests that, when it comes to U.S. Presidents, the market is a true Independent.
The IRS just announced inflation adjustments for 2013. These rules affect many things such as your retirement plan contributions, gift tax exclusion, and the "kiddie" tax. Make sure to bookmark this link as a handy reference.